Skip to the story
U225XSTRANGE FILES
New York, United States; purported lunar observations

The Great Moon Hoax: Creatures in the Newspaper

1835

BACK IN THE DAYLIGHT

Following the trail

Documented newspaper hoax

The Library of Congress identifies Sun reporter Richard Locke as the author and the supposed scientific reporting as a hoax. The stories were attributed to an invented intermediary, Dr. Andrew Grant, rather than being genuine discoveries by Herschel. Contemporary interest in possible lunar inhabitants helped make the fiction plausible. The articles are historical evidence of a deception, not evidence that any such beings were seen.

Why it stays with us

The campfire in this case was a printing press. A place readers could see overhead but could not inspect closely became an ideal setting for confident invention. The episode keeps its strange charm when clearly labeled: the astonishing event occurred on Earth, where a newspaper briefly gave an imagined world the authority of a scientific report.

Follow the sources 1
Open the original record ↗